Sinclair Wanted to Rival Fox News. Now It Faces a $48 Million Fine.

Sinclair Broadcast Group was meant to be the new Fox News, a conservative media outlet that would become an even more vocal proponent of President Trump and his policies as it took control of local televisions from coast to coast. As Sinclair’s leaders forged ties with the White House, the company’s move to buy a rival group of TV stations at one point appeared assured.

“Sinclair’s conduct during its attempt to merge with Tribune was completely unacceptable,” Ajit Pai, the commission’s chairman, said in a statement. “Today’s penalty, along with the failure of the Sinclair/Tribune transaction, should serve as a cautionary tale to other licensees seeking commission approval of a transaction in the future.”

The company seemed to take its punishment in stride. “Sinclair is pleased with the resolution announced today by the F.C.C. and to be moving forward,” Chris Ripley, Sinclair’s chief executive, said in a tweet on Wednesday.

Sinclair’s bid to buy Tribune would have created the nation’s largest owner of broadcast stations and minted a new national conservative voice, a prospect President Trump cheered.

The company is controlled by its chairman, David D. Smith, whose father founded the business in 1971. He had planned to give the stations — which would have reached seven in 10 American households if the deal had a gone through — a common voice through so-called “must-run” editorials that Sinclair’s on-air personalities would read before the camera.

“You can’t be serious!” he said in an email interview at the time. “Do you understand that as a practical matter every word that comes out of the mouths of network news people is scripted and approved by someone?”

Sinclair’s ambitions seemed unlikely to come to fruition in August 2018, when Mr. Pai said he had “serious concerns” about the broadcaster’s merger with Tribune. He asked the agency’s four commissioners to hand off its review of the merger to an administrative law judge to determine the legality of the proposal.

Still, the commission’s action on Wednesday represented was a stunning reversal. Three years ago, the merger seemed to be a done deal, thanks in part to policy changes proposed or enacted by the F.C.C. that Mr. Smith lobbied hard to obtain. They included an easing of the cap on how many stations a broadcaster could own and a relaxing of a restriction on advertising revenue and other resources shared by TV stations. The changes appeared tailored to allow a local broadcast business to get even bigger — perfect for Sinclair’s ambitions.

Toward the end of 2017, the top internal watchdog for the F.C.C. had opened an investigation into whether Mr. Pai had improperly pushed for the rule changes.

In August 2018, Tribune Media revealed some of Sinclair’s hardball tactics in a lawsuit it had filed against Sinclair after the merger plan fell through.

Those tactics came about at a time when Sinclair faced opposition from the Justice Department in its bid to buy Tribune. The agency told Sinclair it would need to sell off stations in at least 10 markets to obtain approval, but the company refused, “deciding instead to antagonize D.O.J. officials,” the suit read.

Although the merger plan required approval from both the Justice Department and the F.C.C., Sinclair preferred to broker an agreement first with the Justice Department. The company considered Justice Department approval to be more of a challenge, viewing the F.C.C., and Mr. Pai, as more of an ally.

In a 2017 letter addressed to Makan Delrahim, the head of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, Sinclair contrasted his position to that of Mr. Pai. “It was so refreshing to see the F.C.C., under Ajit Pai’s leadership, undertake a fundamental reform of its media ownership rules to relax regulations,” the letter read.

As the record fine on Wednesday showed, the F.C.C. ended up disapproving of Sinclair’s way of doing business.

Source Article